Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kiddo Cabbusses"
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I mean no harm, man. You're okay. | I mean no harm, man. You're okay. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Edit: Also, the modifying discussion thing leaves itself a bit too open for my tastes as well, but to my knowledge there's no way to make it where a user can only edit parts of a page that they've contributed. It's mostly an honor system I think, with the "history" bit available if you suspect that someone's changed someone else's statement(s). | ||
-SoNick 11:48, 30 March 2008 (PDT) | -SoNick 11:48, 30 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ah, my apologies, then. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I honestly wouldn't have suspected much if it weren't for the reverting of my K contrib... I honestly thought that such a pointless reversion (The KOF joke honestly isn't as funny as some other things, but it certainly wasn't worth a reversion either) would've only been done purely to spite. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Aw, well. Article's there now. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Undo revision 2193 by [[Special:Contributions/CUMCHRIST|CUMCHRIST]] ([[User talk:CUMCHRIST|Talk]]) == | ||
+ | |||
+ | It might be more productive to deface the page of somebody who actually cares about the wiki. Just a suggestion. |
Latest revision as of 00:35, 17 August 2008
to SoNick:
"lately"? I've been doing them for a long time, and apparently Some people think they're still funny.
Also, I'm fairly certain half the point of the Wiki was to archive the memes. Would you rather I have just made an overblown, egotistical Wiki page about myself? Too late for that now, eh? You created one for me, and yet apparently the only "Contribution" you could make was a flame.
Also, there was no point in reverting the change I made to "K" other than to be spiteful.
(BTW: I really don't modifying discussion should be allowed? Erm, well, testing regardless.)
Response[edit]
Right, you're taking this way more seriously than I'd expected.
I actually had some half-ideas for an over-the-top article, but I decided to be more subtle after the "K" edit, as I thought that it might look too mean if I went with my original half-ideas
I mean no harm, man. You're okay.
Edit: Also, the modifying discussion thing leaves itself a bit too open for my tastes as well, but to my knowledge there's no way to make it where a user can only edit parts of a page that they've contributed. It's mostly an honor system I think, with the "history" bit available if you suspect that someone's changed someone else's statement(s).
-SoNick 11:48, 30 March 2008 (PDT)
Ah, my apologies, then.
I honestly wouldn't have suspected much if it weren't for the reverting of my K contrib... I honestly thought that such a pointless reversion (The KOF joke honestly isn't as funny as some other things, but it certainly wasn't worth a reversion either) would've only been done purely to spite.
Aw, well. Article's there now.
Undo revision 2193 by CUMCHRIST (Talk)[edit]
It might be more productive to deface the page of somebody who actually cares about the wiki. Just a suggestion.